Accessibility Watch

Accessibility report for suno.com

Accessibility grade: D
Based on an automated WCAG 2.1 Level AA scan on July 11, 2026.

suno.com does not yet meet WCAG 2.1 Level AA, the accessibility standard written into U.S. and EU law. This automated scan found 4 types of barrier affecting people with disabilities.

On this page, the most frequent barrier is "Some content on the page isn't inside a recognized region (header, nav, main, footer, aside)" — found on 145 elements. In total the scan flagged 152 issues across 4 categories of WCAG 2.1 Level AA.

WCAG 2.1 Level AA is the standard U.S. courts apply under the ADA, and the law across the EU under the European Accessibility Act. These barriers block screen-reader, keyboard-only, and low-vision users — and every one of them is fixable. Here's how.

What needs fixing to meet the standard

Some buttons have no description that screen readers can announce.

button-name · critical · 1 instance

WCAG 4.1.2 (Level A) Section 508EN 301 549 Affects screen-reader users

Why it matters: Visual users see an icon (a heart, a trash can, an X), but screen-reader users hear only 'button' — they don't know if it'll favorite a post, delete it, or close a dialog. This is a critical accessibility blocker and a top lawsuit driver.

How to fix it: Every button needs a text label. If you can't put text inside the button (icon-only design), in your platform's button settings look for an 'Aria label' or 'Screen reader text' field — fill it with what the button does ('Close', 'Add to cart', 'Open menu').

Technical details for your developer →

Some links have no readable text — usually icon-only links.

link-name · serious · 5 instances

WCAG 4.1.2 (Level A) Section 508EN 301 549 Affects screen-reader users

Why it matters: Screen-reader users hear 'link' but not where the link goes. Users navigate by listening to a list of links — useless if every entry is just 'link, link, link'.

How to fix it: In your site editor, for icon-only links (social-media icons, navigation arrows), set an 'Aria label' or 'Title' field describing where it goes ('Follow us on Twitter', 'Next page').

Technical details for your developer →

Heading levels skip — for example, an H2 jumps directly to an H4 with no H3 between them.

heading-order · moderate · 1 instance

Affects screen-reader users

Why it matters: Screen-reader users navigate by heading levels. Skipped levels suggest missing content and break the page's outline. Confusing for everyone.

How to fix it: In your editor, find the headings that skip levels and either bump them up to the right level (H4 → H3 if no H2 exists between) or insert the missing level. Headings should follow a logical outline like a document outline.

Technical details for your developer →

Get compliant, free

The free wcagcheckr browser extension finds every one of these issues on your own pages and gives you the fix recipe for each — at no cost. Run it, fix what it finds, and re-check this page anytime.

Own this site? Fix the issues, then re-scan — this report updates automatically, and comes down entirely once you pass.

Or remove this report without fixing →

Some content on the page isn't inside a recognized region (header, nav, main, footer, aside).

region · moderate · 145 instances

Affects keyboard-only users

Why it matters: Screen-reader users navigate by these regions. Content outside any region can be missed when skimming.

How to fix it: Developer fix: 'wrap orphaned page content in semantic landmark elements (<main>, <aside>, <nav>) so it's reachable via landmark nav'.

Technical details for your developer →

This is an automated scan and catches a portion of accessibility barriers; full WCAG 2.1 Level AA conformance also requires manual and assistive-technology testing. See our methodology for what we do and don't claim.

Learn more

How this report was produced

This report is an automated scan of the page as it was publicly served on , using [email protected]. The captured page and these results are sealed with a tamper-evident hash (078bd17e9226d152…). We report only what the page publicly returned at that time.

This seal is anchored to a trusted RFC-3161 timestamp via freetsa.org on . Independently verify this receipt →