Accessibility report for journeys.com
Based on an automated WCAG 2.1 Level AA scan on June 9, 2026.
journeys.com does not yet meet WCAG 2.1 Level AA, the accessibility standard written into U.S. and EU law. This automated scan found 10 types of barrier affecting people with disabilities.
On this page, the most frequent barrier is "Some content on the page isn't inside a recognized region (header, nav, main, footer, aside)" — found on 14 elements. In total the scan flagged 37 issues across 10 categories of WCAG 2.1 Level AA.
WCAG 2.1 Level AA is the standard U.S. courts apply under the ADA, and the law across the EU under the European Accessibility Act. These barriers block screen-reader, keyboard-only, and low-vision users — and every one of them is fixable. Here's how.
What needs fixing to meet the standard
An element uses a screen-reader role but is missing required information for that role.
WCAG 4.1.2 (Level A) EN 301 549 Affects screen-reader users
Why it matters: Custom controls (sliders, tabs, dialogs) need specific extra info to work properly with screen readers. Missing pieces = broken behavior.
How to fix it: Developer fix: 'this role requires additional aria-* attributes; check axe-core docs for the specific role'.
Get compliant, free
The free wcagcheckr browser extension finds every one of these issues on your own pages and gives you the fix recipe for each — at no cost. Run it, fix what it finds, and re-check this page anytime.
Own this site? Fix the issues, then re-scan — this report updates automatically, and comes down entirely once you pass.
Some form fields have no label that screen readers can announce.
WCAG 4.1.2 (Level A) Section 508EN 301 549 Affects screen-reader and cognitive-disability users
Why it matters: Visually you can see what each field is for (next to a 'Name:' or 'Email:' text), but screen-reader users hear only 'edit text' if there's no programmatic label connecting the text to the field. The result: blind users can't tell what to type where.
How to fix it: In a website builder, every form field has a 'Label' field or similar. Make sure every input has one filled in. Placeholder text (the gray hint inside the field) does NOT count as a label — it has to be a real label.
An accessibility rule failed on this page.
WCAG 4.1.2 (Level A) EN 301 549 Affects screen-reader users
Why it matters: Some users — particularly those using screen readers, keyboard-only navigation, or who have low vision or motor disabilities — may have trouble using this part of the page.
How to fix it: Share the technical rule ID with your developer. They can look up the full fix at https://dequeuniversity.com/rules/axe.
A button's visible text doesn't match the description it announces to screen readers.
WCAG 2.5.3 (Level A) EN 301 549 Affects screen-reader users
Why it matters: A user dictating 'click Submit' to voice-control software may see 'Submit' on screen but the announce-name is something else, so the voice command fails.
How to fix it: Developer fix: 'aria-label should start with or fully contain the visible button text'.
Some buttons or links are too small to tap reliably on touch screens.
WCAG 2.5.8 (Level AA) Affects low-vision and colorblind users
Why it matters: WCAG 2.2 requires touch targets to be at least 24×24 pixels. Small targets are a problem for users with hand tremors, large fingers, or motor disabilities. They're also frustrating for everyone.
How to fix it: In your editor, increase padding around small icon buttons. If your developer is involved, ask them to ensure all interactive elements have minimum 24×24 CSS pixels of clickable area.
An accessibility rule failed on this page.
Affects screen-reader users
Why it matters: Some users — particularly those using screen readers, keyboard-only navigation, or who have low vision or motor disabilities — may have trouble using this part of the page.
How to fix it: Share the technical rule ID with your developer. They can look up the full fix at https://dequeuniversity.com/rules/axe.
An accessibility rule failed on this page.
Affects screen-reader users
Why it matters: Some users — particularly those using screen readers, keyboard-only navigation, or who have low vision or motor disabilities — may have trouble using this part of the page.
How to fix it: Share the technical rule ID with your developer. They can look up the full fix at https://dequeuniversity.com/rules/axe.
This page is missing a main heading (H1).
Affects screen-reader users
Why it matters: Screen-reader users use the H1 to confirm they landed on the right page. The H1 is also a strong SEO signal — Google uses it to understand what the page is about.
How to fix it: Add a clear, descriptive H1 to the top of the page. In website builders, this is usually the 'Title' or 'Page heading' setting. Each page should have exactly one H1.
Some content on the page isn't inside a recognized region (header, nav, main, footer, aside).
Affects keyboard-only users
Why it matters: Screen-reader users navigate by these regions. Content outside any region can be missed when skimming.
How to fix it: Developer fix: 'wrap orphaned page content in semantic landmark elements (<main>, <aside>, <nav>) so it's reachable via landmark nav'.
Some images have alt text that duplicates nearby visible text.
Affects screen-reader users
Why it matters: Screen-reader users hear the same content twice — the surrounding text and then the alt text. Annoying, not blocking. Lower-priority fix.
How to fix it: Find images where the caption or nearby paragraph already says what the image shows, and either change the alt text to add new info or set the alt to empty (so the screen reader skips it as decorative).
This is an automated scan and catches a portion of accessibility barriers; full WCAG 2.1 Level AA conformance also requires manual and assistive-technology testing. See our methodology for what we do and don't claim.
Learn more
How this report was produced
This report is an automated scan of the page as it was publicly served on
,
using [email protected]. The captured page and these results are sealed with a
tamper-evident hash (c176e0941a06fc65…).
We report only what the page publicly returned at that time.
This seal is anchored to a trusted RFC-3161 timestamp via freetsa.org on . Independently verify this receipt →